Director overboardedness in South Africa: evaluating the experience and busyness hypotheses
Suzette Viviers () and
Nadia Mans-Kemp
Additional contact information
Suzette Viviers: Stellenbosch University
Nadia Mans-Kemp: Stellenbosch University
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2019, vol. 16, issue 1, No 5, 68-81
Abstract:
Abstract Concerns have been raised by shareholders and corporate governance experts about directors serving on too many boards simultaneously. The contrasting busyness and experience hypotheses have been used in this study to explain the consequences of the phenomenon. South Africa presents a unique case study given pressure on listed companies to improve their board diversity. Owing to a limited talent pool, several diverse directors appear to be overextended. The analysis centred on 1610 directors who served on the boards of the 100 largest companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period 2011–2016. A broad measure of director overboardedness was computed to include these directorships and positions held at unlisted companies and other entities. Just less than one-third of the sampled directors held three or more board seats concurrently, a guideline often used to reflect overboardedness. They were mostly black women over the age of 60 serving as independent non-executives. Compared to their non-overboarded counterparts, overboarded directors were better educated, had more specialised occupational backgrounds and had longer tenures on the boards on which they served. Contrary to expectation, no significant difference was observed in the percentage board meetings attended by overboarded and non-overboarded directors. It is hence recommended that nomination committees and shareholder activists should consider director overboardedness on a case-by-case basis. As shown in this study, multi-boarded directors could be valuable repositories of experience. Deliberations on busyness should acknowledge the advantages that interlocked directors could bring to the boardroom, especially those from diverse backgrounds.
Keywords: Director overboardedness; Busyness hypothesis; Experience hypothesis; Board meeting attendance; Board diversity; South Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41310-019-00057-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:16:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1057_s41310-019-00057-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.palgrave.com/gp/journal/41310
DOI: 10.1057/s41310-019-00057-x
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance is currently edited by Michael Alles
More articles in International Journal of Disclosure and Governance from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().