EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mapping borrowers’ and lenders’ interactions according to their dark financial profiles

Olivier Mesly () and Hareesh Mavoori ()
Additional contact information
Olivier Mesly: ICN ARTEM
Hareesh Mavoori: ICN ARTEM

Journal of Marketing Analytics, 2024, vol. 12, issue 4, No 22, 1090-1104

Abstract: Abstract In this interdisciplinary, conceptual article with implications in marketing financial products and services, we study real estate and capital markets characterized by a predatory paradigm and economic agents’ dark financial profiles (DFPs). These are estimated by three orthogonal components—disconnection, irrationality, and deceit. We identify the best interactional patterns of borrower-lender profiles, ones that expectedly minimize the risk of default. We resort to discretized, predator–prey Lotka–Volterra equations where lenders act as predators and borrowers as prey, incorporating market trends and learning effects. To mathematically operationalize our framework, we use combinatorics with high, medium, and low levels of the three components of DFPs. We find 27 salient lender-borrower interactional scenarios and observe three different patterns: explosive, conducive, and implosive. Our theoretical findings indicate that equal (ir)rationality (in financial terms) between lenders and borrowers is a necessary but insufficient condition to maintain harmonious, long-term relationships. We use eutectic theory to map the agents’ profiles by introducing another variable: Expected return [E(Rp)] versus risk [σ], using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) as a base. We find six market segments: the inactive predators and prey, the loose, the greedy, the vulnerable, and the stable. We identify the optimal combination of borrowers–lenders interaction under risk, given market trends and learning effects. We propose a path for future research that would see the application of analytical tools such as factor analysis, k-means clustering algorithm, χ2 and non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests to verify differences among the hypothesized segments.

Keywords: Borrowers; Combinatorics; Dark financial profile; Deceit; Disconnection; Eutectic; Irrationality; Learning; Lenders (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G41 M21 M31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-023-00263-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:12:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-023-00263-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... gement/journal/41270

DOI: 10.1057/s41270-023-00263-1

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Marketing Analytics is currently edited by Maria Petrescu and Anjala Krishnen

More articles in Journal of Marketing Analytics from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:12:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-023-00263-1