Back-testing, risk estimation models: a simulation study for two-asset portfolios
Gyöngyi Bugár () and
Máté Uzsoki ()
Additional contact information
Gyöngyi Bugár: UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS-FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
Máté Uzsoki: UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS-FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
UPFBE Working Paper Series from Faculty of Business and Economics, University Pécs
Abstract:
The aim of the study is to check the validity of five different risk-estimation models for two-asset portfolios, a topic which is relevant in model selection both for determining the minimum capital requirements for trading book portfolios and for the regulatory monitoring of the performance of internal risk models. Simulations based on a real data set containing the FTSE 100 constituents were carried out, and the risk was gauged by Expected Shortfall, a measure which also captures tail risk. Given that the period studied includes that of the subprime crisis, there is an inherent opportunity to compare and contrast the results produced under disaster conditions with others from less stressful periods. Our empirical analysis has confirmed that using Expected Shortfall instead of Value-at-Risk alone is not enough, and that the risk model has to be carefully selected and back-tested. The general Pareto distribution proved to be a prudent choice for risk models. In fact, among the five models considered, the model when general Pareto marginals were coupled with Clayton copula showed the best performance. It was, however, also revealed that this model is susceptible to being “over-cautious” in estimating loss.
Keywords: Risk estimation models; Portfolio; Back-testing; Expected Shortfall; Copula (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2021-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/4891/4730 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pec:wpaper:2021_2
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in UPFBE Working Paper Series from Faculty of Business and Economics, University Pécs Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tamás Sebestyén ().