The two "third ways" of capitalism: macroeconomic versus microeconomic regulation. A critical view

Giuseppe Conti

Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Abstract: From the 1930s and 1940s, the main industrial economies explored a "third way" between laissez-faire capitalism and collectivist central planning. In this sense, the "third way" represented a continuum of experiments between two opposite banks: on the one hand macroeconomic regulation of Keynesian type; on the other microeconomic regulation of social market economy (Soziale Marktwirtschaft). The theoretical foundation of social market economy is anti-Keynesian. In this approach, market failures depend on weak competition. In this case, the state intervenes by means of various kinds of incentives with no, or little public expenditure. In Keynesian approaches underemployment equilibria justify state interventions by means of public investments though leaving to the private sector both allocative choices and the related risks. The paper argues, contrary to the premises, that the social market economy, by reintroducing microeconomics solutions based upon bureaucratic rules, violates the main individual liberties, even affecting consumer's choices. The Keynesian welfare state on the contrary follows the liberal tradition of the rule of law, and of the primacy of the civil rights of citizens. The paper discusses the economic and social implications of these two "third ways".

Keywords: Varieties of capitalism; Welfare state; Macro-micro regulation; Social market economy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme, nep-hpe and nep-pke
Note: ISSN 2039-1854
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ec.unipi.it/documents/Ricerca/papers/2015-195.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pie:dsedps:2015/195

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().