Keynes, the Pope and the IMF

Mark Hayes

No PKWP1502, Working Papers from Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES)

Abstract: This paper discusses Keynes’s surprisingly positive views on the medieval scholastic teaching on usury and draws upon his work to argue that the traditional view of usury (understood as the charging of rent for the use of money) as anti-social is well-founded. Keynes’s understanding of the nature of probability allows a clear distinction to be made between debt and equity finance which most economists dismiss. Rather than meriting remuneration, the demand for the security provided by money against an uncertain future imposes a social cost in one form or another. This proposition is illustrated with reference to the problems of the modern international financial and monetary system, specifically the role of deposit insurance and the obstacles to a renewed system of managed exchange rates, without which many regions appear doomed to enduring long-term austerity.

Keywords: Interest; monetary system; commodity standard; deposit insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E42 E52 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30
Date: 2015-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hpe, nep-mac and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://postkeynesian.net/media/working-papers/PKWP1502.pdf First version, 2015 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pke:wpaper:pkwp1502

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jo Michell ().