A cross-country evaluation of cheating in academia: is it related to ‘real world’ business ethics?
Maria Fátima Rocha () and
Aurora Teixeira ()
Additional contact information
Maria Fátima Rocha: Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto and Universidade Fernando Pessoa
FEP Working Papers from Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto
Abstract:
Today’s economics and business students are expected to be our future’s business people and potentially our tomorrow’s economic leaders and politicians. Thus, their beliefs and practices are likely to affect the definition of acceptable economics and business ethics. The empirical evaluation of the cheating phenomenon in academia has been almost exclusively focused on the US context, and the non-US studies involve, in general, a narrow scope of countries. In the present paper we perform a wide cross-country study on the determinants of economics and business undergraduate cheating which involves 21 countries from the American (4), European (14), Africa (2) and Oceania (1) Continents and 7213 students. We found that the average magnitude of copying among the economics and business undergraduates is quite high (62%) but with a significant cross-country heterogeneity. The probability of cheating is significantly lower in students enrolled in schools located in the Nordic or the US plus British Isles blocks when compared with their South Europe counterparts; quite surprisingly that probability is also lower for the African block. Distinctly, students enrolled in schools from the Western and especially from the Eastern Europe observe statistically significant higher propensities for perpetrating academic fraud. Our findings further suggest that average cheating propensity in academia is significantly correlated with ‘real world’ business corruption.
Keywords: cheating; corruption; university; economics; business; countries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A22 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 43 pages
Date: 2006-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-reg, nep-sea and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.06.01_WP214_rochateixeira.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.06.01_WP214_rochateixeira.pdf [302 Found]--> https://fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.06.01_WP214_rochateixeira.pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:por:fepwps:214
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FEP Working Papers from Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().