Die Steuerungswirkungen unterschiedlicher Prozesskostenregelungen: Ein Überblick zum Stand von Theorie und Empirie

The economic effects of alternative fee shifting rules: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature

Christian Schwab and Hin-Yue Benny Tang

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The so-called English Rule in § 91 ZPO has a longstanding tradition in German civil litigation. Although this “loser pays”- fee shifting can raise severe problems like sharply reducing access to the courts for parties of moderate means, the adaption of alternative cost regimes like the U.S.-style American Rule where no fee shifting occurs has never been seriously considered. What is more, the German debate seems to completely ignore the findings of the extensive law and economics literature on fee shifting. This paper addresses this task and surveys the theoretical and empirical literature on the effects of alternative fee shifting systems on a variety of decisions arising during the litigation process. In detail, we put some arguments supporting German-style fee shifting to the test: Does the German system really discourage low-probability-of-prevailing lawsuits that would be brought under the American Rule? Does it encourage the settlement of litigation? And does the German solution lead to lower costs of the legal system compared to alternative fee regimes? The findings indicate that the influence of different fee shifting rules on parties´ decision-making behavior is to a large extent ambiguous. Policy makers should be aware of these problems.

Keywords: Civil Litigation; Fee Shifting; English Rule; American Rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-06-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/32746/1/MPRA_paper_32746.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:32746

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().