Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment

Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo () and Cecilia Testa

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the in�uential paper by Atlas et al. (1995), using a within estimation methodology �nds that small and overrepresented states get signi�cantly larger shares of federal funds. Revisiting the econometric speci�cation used by the current empiri- cal research, we show that the number of senators percapita is inappropriate to capture malapportionement in regressions using broad federal programs, and that the results ob- tained with this indicator are extremely non-robust to reasonable speci�cation changes. In particular, senators percapita have a signi�cant impact on federal spending only in re- gressions containing state �xed e¤ects. Furthermore, the coefficients estimated using the within methodology are statistically di¤erent across states and, therefore, cannot be used to assess spending differentials between states. The magnitude and signi�cance of those coe¢ cients suggest a within state-speci�c inverse relationship between broad spending categories and population which is not systematically related to the size of the states and seems more compatible with incrementalist theories of budget allocation.

Keywords: federal budget; malapportionment; small state advantage; overrepresentation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H5 H50 H53 H59 H61 H76 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5339/1/MPRA_paper_5339.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Small States Get More Federal Monies?Myth and Reality About the US SenateMalapportionment (2009)
Working Paper: Do small states get more federal monies?: myth and reality about the US Senate malapportionment (2009)
Working Paper: Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality About the US Senate Malapportionment (2009)
Working Paper: Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:5339

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().