Economics and Genocide: Choices and Consequences

Jurgen Brauer and Charles Anderton

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Professional economists rarely write on questions of genocide. This surprises because a workhorse tool of the economics discipline concerns the analysis of behavior that takes place under constraints. All parties in genocide—perpetrators, victims, and third parties—face cost and resource constraints subject to which they seek to achieve their objectives, be it killing, surviving, or intervening. This essay characterizes and illustrates economic thinking about objectives, costs, and resources for each of the three groups. There is potentially much that economics can contribute to genocide studies and, vice versa, much that genocide scholars may learn from welcoming an economic perspective.

Keywords: Genocide; economics; constrained optimization; rational choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 D00 D74 H87 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-04-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55014/1/MPRA_paper_55014.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Economics and Genocide: Choices and Consequences (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:55014

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter (winter@lmu.de).