EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Trapped by the high-tech myth: The need and chances for a new policy rationale

Attila Havas

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Against the backdrop of a strong plea for evidence-based policy, this paper juxtaposes how innovation is analyzed in mainstream economics and evolutionary economics of innovation, as well as their concomitant policy rationales. By discussing the indicators selected for the Innovation Union Scoreboard and another major EU report, it argues that the science-push model of innovation is still highly influential in the EU STI policy circles, despite a rich set of research insights stressing the importance of non-R&D types of knowledge in innovation processes. In conclusion, the chapter highlights the potential drawbacks of the persistent high-tech myth, considers possible reasons for its perseverance and discusses policy implications of the systemic view of innovation. Those include: i) STI policies should promote knowledge-intensive activities in all sectors, including low- and medium-technology industries and services; ii) it is a highly demanding set of tasks to identify systemic failures, devise appropriate policies to tackle those, and organize the required stakeholder dialogues; iii) several policies affect innovation processes and performance, perhaps even more strongly than STI policies, and hence policy goals and tools need to be orchestrated across several policy domains; iv) analysts and policy-makers need to be careful when interpreting their country’s ranking on ‘scoreboards’; v) the choice of an economics paradigm to guide policy evaluation is likely to be decisive.

Keywords: Linear and networked models of innovation; Science-push; Market failure; Evolutionary economics of innovation; Systemic failures; STI policy; Opportunity costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B25 O31 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme, nep-ino, nep-knm and nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Hirsch-Kreinsen H, Schwinge I (eds) Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship in Low-Tech Sectors: The Prospects of Traditional Economic Industries (2014): pp. 193-217

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58393/1/MPRA_paper_58393.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/63289/1/MPRA_paper_58393.pdf revised version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Trapped by the high-tech myth: the need and chances for a new policy rationale (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:58393

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:58393