Measurement Error in Binary Explanatory Variables in Panel Data Models: Why Do Cross Section and Panel Estimates of the Union Wage Effect Differ?

George Jakubson
Additional contact information
George Jakubson: Cornell University and NBER

No 589, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.

Abstract: Cross section estimates of the union wage effect are typically much larger than estimates derived from within estimators using panel data. Two competing explanations for this difference have been advanced. The first is that the cross section estimates suffer from an omitted variables bias due to a correlation between unobserved productivity and union status which biases the cross section estimator upwards. The second is that measurement error in union status is more severe in the changes than in the levels, imparting a more severe downward bias to the panel estimator. This paper derives a method of moments estimator which allows for both effects, nested within the same model. The binary nature of the explanatory variable is exploited to derive an estimating model which allows simultaneous estimation of both the structural parameters of the model and the parameters of the measurement error process. When the estimator is applied to sample of men from the PSID we find that allowing for measurement error does lead to a larger estimate of the union wage effect than the usual within estimator, but that most of the difference between the cross section and the panel estimates is not due to measurement error in the union variable. Further, the estimates of the extent of measurement error are close to those found in a validation study of the PSID.

Keywords: panel data models; measurement error; union wage effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D40 D41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1986-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp01cf95jb453/1/209.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Internal Server Error

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:209

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().