 Tensions of Structural Change: Evidence from Finland’s Field Reservation PolicyAapo Stenhammar () No 341, Working Papers from Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE Abstract: While structural transformation is vital for economic development, it often counters resistance. To shed light on the tension between the political and economic effects of structural change, I study a policy that paid farmers to stop farming in 1970s Finland. Using over 290,000 newly digitized Agricultural Census forms linked to rich register data, I find that this Field Reservation Policy led to farm closures but did not affect farmers’ income or geographical mobility. However, it had an important intergenerational effect. Children of the most affected farmers had 2.7% higher earnings and were more likely to work in office and managerial positions. Surprisingly, the positive effects on income are predominantly driven by children with lower cognitive skills. Despite the economic benefits, the policy faced a political backlash contributing to the rise of a populist rural party. I provide evidence for two separate explanations for this political reaction: identity-based backlash by offended farmers and negative externalities arising from field reservation. Keywords: structural change; intergenerational mobility; occupational choice; political populism (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pst:wpaper:341 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.