Deriving Weights for the Index of Multiple Deprivation Based on Societal Preferences: The Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment

Verity Watson, Matt Sutton, Chris Dibben and Mandy Ryan

No 24, OPHI Working Papers from Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford

Abstract: In this paper we illustrate the use of a stated preference method, discrete choice experiments, to derive domain weights for the IMD. To do this, respondents were asked to make a series of choices between two deprivation states. To ensure the realism of, and respondents’ engagement with, the task, we refer to each state as a hypothetical person’s circumstances. In each choice, we ask respondents to state which person needs the most additional support from the government. We show that respondents place greater weight on housing and health, and less weight on employment, than the existing IMD.

Date: 2008-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ophi.org.uk/working-paper-number-24/ (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp024

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OPHI Working Papers from Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford Queen Elizabeth House 3 Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TB United Kingdom. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IT Support ().