The Political Consequences of Vaccines: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Eligibility Rules

Felipe Gonzalez
Additional contact information
Felipe Gonzalez: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Instituto de Economıa

No 953, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance

Abstract: Vaccines are responsible for large increases in human welfare and yet we know little about the political impacts of publicly-managed vaccination campaigns. We fill this gap by studying the case of Chile, which offers a rare combination of a high-stakes election, voluntary voting, and a vaccination process halfway implemented by election day. Crucially, the roll-out of vaccines relied on exogenous eligibility rules which we combine with a pre-analysis plan for causal identification. We find that higher vaccination rates boost political participation and empower challengers irrespective of their party affiliation. Survey evidence suggests that vaccines could have increased preferences for challengers by lowering decision-related anxiety.

Keywords: vaccines; politics; election; challengers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-lam and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sef/media/econ/research/workingpapers/wp953.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:953

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).