Why We Need Knowledge-based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates

Matthew C Nisbet and Declan Fahy

Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar

Abstract: Largely overlooked by researchers studying the science of science communication are the specific journalistic practices and media structures that might enable more constructive public debate in politicized science controversies. In this commentary, we discuss the role that journalists can play as influential knowledge professionals, drawing on insights from the studies in this section of the special issue. In doing so, we outline three complementary approaches to what Thomas Patterson calls ?knowledge-based journalism.? By way of these approaches, journalists and their news organizations can contextualize and critically evaluate expert knowledge; facilitate discussion that bridges entrenched ideological divisions; and promote consideration of a broader menu of policy options and technologies. We conclude by discussing the implications for journalism education.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-knm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://scholar.harvard.edu/matthewnisbet/node/229231
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://scholar.harvard.edu/matthewnisbet/node/229231 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://scholar.harvard.edu/matthewnisbet/node/229231)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:229231

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Brandon ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).