A Taxanomy of A-Level Subjects According to the Expressed Preferences of Russell Group Universities: Who Does What?

Catherine Dilnot ()
Additional contact information
Catherine Dilnot: UCL Institute of Education and Oxford Brookes University

No 15-12, DoQSS Working Papers from Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London

Abstract: While the proportions of young people in England progressing to university have increased considerably over the last fifty years, those from the least privileged backgrounds remain under-represented at highly selective universities. The biggest barrier to participation remains low attainment, but other factors may also be important. One postulated factor is the role of A-level subject choice, with the Russell Group of large, research intensive, highly selective universities seeking to address a lack of information held by students at age 16+ by publishing a list of subjects which it describes as facilitating of university entry. Their list covers a minority of the A-level subjects available to English students in 2014/15, and the extent to which the remaining subjects are facilitating or not of entry is unclear. In this work I develop a taxonomy of all 96 A-level subjects available in 2014/15, based on the published preferences of Russell Group universities, and go on to describe the differences in take-up of these subjects by gender and school type. Using recently linked National Pupil Database and Higher Education Statistics Agency data I then apply the taxonomy to three recent cohorts of university entrants, giving prima facie evidence of variations in proportions of subjects from different categories held by Russell Group and non-Russell Group entrants, and map these categories onto previous work on subject difficulty. The taxonomy provides a useful starting point for the analysis of the role of subject choice in university application, is informative in the context of current A-level reforms and draws attention to subjects taken by significant numbers of Russell Group students that are not available at many state schools and colleges.

Keywords: A-level subject choice; Facilitating subjects; Access to Higher Education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 I24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-12-29
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ucl.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1512.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qss:dqsswp:1512

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in DoQSS Working Papers from Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London Quantitative Social Science, Social Research Institute, 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr Neus Bover Fonts ().