Teenage conduct problems: a lifetime of disadvantage in the labour market?
Sam Parsons,
Alex Bryson and
Alice Sullivan
Additional contact information
Sam Parsons: Social Research Institute, UCL
Alice Sullivan: Social Research Institute, UCL
No 21-22, DoQSS Working Papers from Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London
Abstract:
Using data from two British birth cohorts born in 1958 and 1970 we investigate the impact of teenage conduct problems on subsequent employment prospects through to age 42. We find teenagers with conduct problems went on to spend fewer months both in paid employment, and in employment, education and training (EET) between age 17 and 42 than comparable teenagers who did not experience conduct problems. Employment and EET disadvantages were greatest among those with severe behavioural problems. The ‘gap’ in time spent in employment or EET by conduct problem status was similar for men and women across cohorts, with only a small part of the gap being attenuated by differences in social background, individual characteristics and educational attainment in public examination at age 16. We discuss the implications of our findings.
Keywords: behavioural problems; Rutter; labour market; employment; education; training; disadvantage; educational attainment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 J20 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-08-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur, nep-isf and nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp2122.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Teenage conduct problems: a lifetime of disadvantage in the labour market? (2024) 
Working Paper: Teenage Conduct Problems: A Lifetime of Disadvantage in the Labour Market? (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qss:dqsswp:2122
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DoQSS Working Papers from Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London Quantitative Social Science, Social Research Institute, 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr Neus Bover Fonts (n.bover-fonts@ucl.ac.uk).