CCPs and Banks: Different Risks, Different Regulations

David Hughes and Mark Manning
Additional contact information
David Hughes: Reserve Bank of Australia
Mark Manning: Reserve Bank of Australia

RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), 2015, 67-80

Abstract: Recent debate on the adequacy of regulatory standards for central counterparties (CCPs) has often drawn on the experience of bank regulation. This article draws out the essential differences between CCPs and banks, considering the implications of these differences for the regulatory approach. It argues that banks and CCPs affect systemic stability in different ways, with a CCP's systemic importance largely derived from its central role and a bank's systemic importance typically derived from the size and breadth of its activities. Any refinements to regulatory standards for CCPs that are drawn from bank regulation should not overlook these differences.

Keywords: Central counterparties; bank regulation; risk frameworks; systemic importance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2015/dec/pdf/bu-1215-8.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rba:rbabul:dec2015-08

Access Statistics for this article

RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued) is currently edited by Luci Ellis

More articles in RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued) from Reserve Bank of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paula Drew ().