Sweet Lemons: Mitigating Collusion in Organizations
Martin Pollrich and
Colin von Negenborn
No 100, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Abstract:
This paper shows that the possibility of collusion between an agent and a supervisor imposes no restrictions on the set of implementable social choice functions (SCF) and associated payoff vectors. Any SCF and any payoff profile that are implementable if the supervisor′s information was public is also implementable when this information is private and collusion is possible. To implement a given SCF we propose a one-sided mechanism that endogenously creates private information for the supervisor vis-à-vis the agent, and conditions both players′ payoffs on this endogenous information. We show that in such a mechanism all collusive side-bargaining fails, similar to the trade failure in Akerlof′s (1970) car market and in models of bilateral trade.
Keywords: mechanism design; collusion; asymmetric information; correlation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 D83 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-06-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des, nep-gth and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... ussion_paper/100.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Sweet lemons: Mitigating collusion in organizations (2020) 
Working Paper: Sweet Lemons: Mitigating Collusion in Organizations (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:100
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().