EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Women Less Effective Leaders than Men? Evidence from Experiments Using Coordination Games

Lea Heursen, Eva Ranehill and Roberto Weber
Additional contact information
Lea Heursen: HU Berlin
Roberto Weber: University of Zurich

No 472, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition

Abstract: We study whether one reason behind female underrepresentation in leadership is that female leaders are less effective at coordinating followers’ actions. Two experiments using coordination games investigate whether female leaders are less successful than males in persuading followers to coordinate on efficient equilibria. In these settings, successful coordination hinges on higher-order beliefs about the leader’s capacity to convince followers to pursue desired actions, making beliefs that women are less effective leaders potentially self-confirming. We find no evidence that such bias impacts actual leadership performance, precisely estimating the absence of a gender leadership gap. We further show that this result is surprising given experts’ priors.

Keywords: gender; coordination games; leadership; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C92 D23 J1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-12-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-hrm and nep-lab
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... ussion_paper/472.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Are Women Less Effective Leaders Than Men? Evidence from Experiments Using Coordination Games (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Are women less effective leaders than men? Evidence from experiments using coordination games (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Are women less effective leaders than men? Evidence from experiments using coordination games (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:472

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:472