Testing Consumer Theory: Evidence From a Natural Field Experiment

Maja Adena, Steffen Huck and Imran Rasul

No 54, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition

Abstract: We present evidence from a natural field experiment designed to shed light on whether individual behavior is consistent with a neoclassical model of utility maximization subject to budget constraints. We do this through the lens of a field experiment on charitable giving. We find that the behavior of at least 80% of individuals, on both the extensive and intensive margins, can be rationalized within a standard neoclassical choice model in which individuals have preferences, defined over own consumption and their contribution towards the charitable good, satisfying the axioms of revealed preference.

Keywords: natural field experiment; revealed preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D01 D12 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-11-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... cussion_paper/54.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Testing consumer theory: evidence from a natural field experiment (2017)
Journal Article: Testing consumer theory: evidence from a natural field experiment (2017)
Working Paper: Testing consumer theory: Evidence from a natural field experiment (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:54

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().