Accommodating Stake Effects under Prospect Theory
Ranoua Bouchouicha () and
Ferdinand Vieider ()
No em-dp2016-03, Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Reading
Abstract:
We investigate how to accommodate qualitative changes in risk preferences over outcomes and probabilities under prospect theory. We find a double two-fold pattern of risk preferences for gains, one over probabilities and one over outcomes. While such patterns over probabilities are an integral part of prospect theory, a solution on how to incorporate two-fold patterns over outcomes has only recently been proposed by Scholten and Read (2014) [Prospect theory and the 'forgotten' fourfold pattern of risk preferences. JRU 48(1)]. We use this insight to address violations of probability-outcome separability under prospect theory as stakes increase [Fehr-Duda, Bruhin, Epper, and Schubert (2010). Rationality on the Rise: Why Relative Risk Aversion Increases with Stake Size. JRU 40(2)]. We replicate the violations using traditional functional forms such as power or exponential utility. Using logarithmic utility instead makes the violations disappear, showing the importance of accommodating changing risk preferences across the outcome dimension.
Keywords: risk preferences; prospect theory; probability-outcome separability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C51 C52 C91 D03 D90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2016-04-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/economics/emdp2016120.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Reading Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexander Mihailov ().