Pension Scheme Redesign and Wealth Redistribution Between the Members and Sponsor: The USS Rule Change in October 2011

Emmanouil Platanakis and Charles Sutcliffe ()
Additional contact information
Emmanouil Platanakis: ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading
Charles Sutcliffe: ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading

ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, University of Reading

Abstract: The redesign of defined benefit pension schemes usually results in a substantial redistribution of wealth between age cohorts of members, pensioners, and the sponsor. This is the first study to quantify the redistributive effects of a rule change by a real world scheme (the Universities Superannuation Scheme, USS) where the sponsor underwrites the pension promise. In October 2011 USS closed its final salary scheme to new members, opened a career average revalued earnings (CARE) section, and moved to 'cap and share' contribution rates. We find that the pre-October 2011 scheme was not viable in the long run, while the post-October 2011 scheme is probably viable in the long run, but faces medium term problems. In October 2011 future members of USS lost 65% of their pension wealth (or roughly £100,000 per head), equivalent to a reduction of roughly 11% in their total compensation, while those aged over 57 years lost almost nothing. The riskiness of the pension wealth of future members increased by a third, while the riskiness of the present value of the sponsor's future contributions reduced by 10%. Finally, the sponsor's wealth increased by about £32.5 billion, equivalent to a reduction of 26% in their pension costs.

Keywords: Defined benefit; Pension scheme; Redistribution; USS; Scheme design; Risk shifting; Risk management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G22 G23 J32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/images/2015/11/VBGA-29-Revised-Discussion-paper.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Pension scheme redesign and wealth redistribution between the members and sponsor: The USS rule change in October 2011 (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rdg:icmadp:icma-dp2015-05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, University of Reading Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marie Pearson ().