Do Survey Joiners and Leavers Differ from Regular Participants? The US SPF GDP Growth and Inflation Forecasts

Michael Clements

ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, University of Reading

Abstract: If learning-by-doing is important for macro-forecasting, newcomers might be different to regular, established particants. Stayers may also differ from the soon-to-leave. We test these conjectures for macro-forecasters point predictions of output growth and inflation, and for their histogram forecasts. A bootstrap approach is used to overcome the problems associated with the relatively small numbers of joiners and leavers. Controlling for the numbers of forecasters with the bootstrap approach is required to correctly determine whether there are systematic differences between experienced forecasters and newcomers, and between stayers and leavers.

Keywords: forecast accuracy; experience; learning-by-doing; probability forecasts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mon
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://assets.henley.ac.uk/defaultUploads/ICM-202 ... 539690275.1507819089 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Do survey joiners and leavers differ from regular participants? The US SPF GDP growth and inflation forecasts (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rdg:icmadp:icma-dp2020-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, University of Reading Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marie Pearson ().