Legal Pluralism and Tenure Security: Exploring the Relationship between Statutory and Customary Land Tenure in Zambia
Anthony Mushinge and
Sharon Mulenga
International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2016, vol. 4, issue 3, 7-17
Abstract:
The purpose of the research is to: 1) investigate the interpretation of the sections in the Lands Act of 1995 that provide for the statutory recognition on one hand, and conversion of customary land, on the other; and 2) discuss the effects of the said sections on customary landholders. Methodologically, qualitative methods (largely in-depth interviews) were used to conclude that governments in sub-Sahara Africa are the architects of tenure insecurity because they (knowingly or otherwise) enact laws that are contradictory or conflicting in nature. In the case of Zambia, there are contradicting sections within the Lands Act 1995 where, while one section provides for the conversion of customary land, the other provides for statutory recognition of the same traditional tenure. This therefore casts a shadow of confusion regarding the meaning of ¡°statutory recognition¡± in that in practice ¡°legality¡±, by way of holding private title deed, always takes precedence over ¡°social legitimacy¡±. The implication of this is tenure insecurity and an associated avalanche of evictions, elite capture, sub-division and enclosures of common pool resources, land grabs, and land conflicts. We recommend that, guided by research, concerned governments should consider emulating other countries like Tanzania and Botswana, which have enacted ¡°bespoke¡± land laws that are specifically meant for state land, and other land laws specifically for customary land.
Keywords: Zambia; state land; customary land; customary land recognition; customary land conversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1331/1350 (application/pdf)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1331 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:3:p:7-17
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Social Science Studies from Redfame publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Redfame publishing ().