Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Analysis Deconstructed: Changing Assumptions, Changing Results

Blair Beasley (), Matt Woerman, Anthony Paul (), Dallas Burtraw and Karen Palmer
Additional contact information
Blair Beasley: Resources for the Future
Anthony Paul: Resources for the Future

RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Several recent studies have used simulation models to quantify the potential effects of recent environmental regulations on power plants, including the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), one of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s most expensive regulations. These studies have produced inconsistent results about the effects on the industry, making general conclusions difficult. We attempt to reconcile these differences by representing the variety of assumptions in these studies within a common modeling platform. We find that the assumptions, and their differences from the way MATS will be implemented, make a substantial impact on projected retirement of coal-fired capacity and generation, investments that are required, and emissions reductions. Almost uniformly, the actual regulation, when examined in its final form and in isolation, provides more flexibility than is represented in most models. We find this leads to a smaller impact on the composition of the electricity generating fleet than most studies have predicted.

Keywords: sulfur dioxide; mercury; air toxics; nitrogen oxides; carbon dioxide; electricity; technology; generation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q47 Q53 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-04-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-13-10.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-13-10.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-13-10.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-13-10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().