EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Understanding the Resistance to Carbon Taxes: A Case Study of Sweden

Jens Ewald, Thomas Sterner and Erik Sterner
Additional contact information
Thomas Sterner: Resources for the Future

No 21-18, RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Although carbon taxes are generally well accepted in the countries where they have been implemented to lower carbon emissions, there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large organization that protests against fuel taxes. Our results show that educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government affect opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism are especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. When asked about the use of carbon tax revenue, some respondents support revenue refunding (uniform or progressive), but more people support using it for climate mitigation investments.

Date: 2021-07-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des, nep-ene, nep-env, nep-pbe and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rff.org/documents/3042/WP_21-18_Ewald_et_al.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-21-18

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-21-18