Economies of Scope in Endangered-Species Protection: Evidence from Interest-Group Behavior

Amy Ando

RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: This paper looks for positive spillovers from the legal protection of one species to the welfare of others, and for evidence of economies of scope in the costs associated with protecting species under the Endangered Species Act. The analyses use data on the intensity of interest-group comment activity in response to proposals to protect new species. The results suggest that these phenomena are significant, strengthening arguments that wildlife-protection policy should be shifted towards species groups or ecosystems. However, the findings are also consistent with diminishing public willingness-to-pay for protected species in a given area, a pattern which also has public-policy implications.

Date: 1999-01-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-97-44.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-97-44.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-97-44.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Economies of Scope in Endangered-Species Protection: Evidence from Interest-Group Behavior (2001)
Working Paper: Economies of Scope in Endangered-Species Protection: Evidence from Interest-Group Behavior (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-97-44-rev

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().