Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence
Claudia Landeo and
Kathryn Spier ()
Additional contact information
Kathryn Spier: Harvard Law School, Postal: 1575 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138
No 2015-10, Working Papers from University of Alberta, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This paper experimentally studies stipulated damages as a rent-extraction mechanism. We demonstrate that contract renegotiation induces the sellers to propose the lowest stipulated damages and the entrants to offer the highest price more frequently. We show that complete information about the entrant’s cost lowers exclusion of high-cost entrants. Unanticipated findings are observed. The majority of sellers make more generous offers than expected. Rent extraction also occurs in renegotiation environments. Our findings from the dictatorial seller and buyer-entrant communication treatments suggest the presence of social preferences.
Keywords: Stipulated Damages; Rent Extraction; Market Foreclosure; Renegotiation; Social Preferences; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 D86 K12 K21 L42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 49 pages
Date: 2015-08-29
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.ualberta.ca/~econwps/2015/wp2015-10.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:albaec:2015_010
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Alberta, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joseph Marchand ().