A Study on Private Enterprises and Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies: Focusing on Russia and Vietnam

Seok Hwan Kim (), Jiyoung Min (), Jong Hun Pek () and Sang-Xuan Le ()
Additional contact information
Seok Hwan Kim: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] , Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, , 370, Sicheong-daero, , Sejong-si, Korea,, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/
Jiyoung Min: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] , Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, , 370, Sicheong-daero, , Sejong-si, Korea,, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/
Jong Hun Pek: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] , Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, , 370, Sicheong-daero, , Sejong-si, Korea,, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/
Sang-Xuan Le: Vietnam Institute of Economics, Postal: Institute of Economics, 27 Tran Xuan Soan St,, Hanoi , Vietnam, https://www.jpvn.org/viet-or/vkth.html

No 20-34, World Economy Brief from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Abstract: Russia's privatization took place from small enterprises, apartments, family farms to mid- and large-sized firms. Although national assets and state-owned enterprises were sold to the private sector, the government's fiscal condition did not improve. Rather, the government revenue to GDP ratio decreased in general. Furthermore, the corporate income to GDP ratio shrank more drastically. One of the reasons behind this could be that the tax system was just formed. In addition, as privatization went on, a number of companies failed and the government provided tax off-sets or tax amnesty to businesses. In terms of productivity, privatization had a positive effect. According to J. David Brown, John. S. Earle, and Scott Gehlbah (2013), privatization by both foreigners and Russians increased productivity to different extents by period. However, privatization weakened the government's power, destroyed social order and exacerbated corruption. The opaque and monopolistic manner of privatization in Russia benefited only those who were in power. As a result, Russia became a phony capitalist economy and private companies and businessmen came to have a negative public image. The word "piratization" was also coined based on this. Vietnam's equitization, which began in the early 1990s, is still underway. Even though the government has announced privatization plans on several occasions, the process has been very slow with mediocre achievements. State-owned companies in Vietnam are struggling with debt issues and diseconomies of scale, which can be connected with the country's falling industrial competitiveness. The default of Vinashin Group (largest Vietnamese shipbuilder) in December 2010 was a representative instance that highlighted the need to reform state-run companies. The World Bank also recommended that in order for the Vietnamese economy to develop into a middle-income country by 2035, privatization of state-owned enterprises will have to be accelerated. (the rest omitted)

Keywords: Russia; Vietnam; private enterprise; privatization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 6 pages
Date: 2020-12-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-sea and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10105040000 ... ist_no=5117&cg_code= Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kiepwe:2020_034

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in World Economy Brief from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy [30147] 3rd Floor Building C Sejong National Research Complex 370 Sicheong-daero Sejong-si, Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geun Hye Son ().