Empirical Assessment of Trade Engagements: Africa, China and the Maritime Belt and Road Initiative
Igbinoba Emmanuel ()
Additional contact information
Igbinoba Emmanuel: Diversity Watch Limited England
No 17-7, Working Papers from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy
Abstract:
Recent development economic literatures theorize that South-South trade and foreign investment may have a larger impact on economic growth in developing economies than North-South trade and investment, since investors from the South are more familiar with local developing markets and business practices, which increases their productivity spillovers (Aykut and Goldstein 2007). Amighini and Sanfilippo (2014) provided evidence that South-South trade and investments stimulate product diversification in light manufacturing industries such as agroprocessing, plastic, textile and leather production. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) launched in 2013, aims to create economic opportunities as well as improve and establish new trading routes between China and connected regions. This paper attempts to evaluate the degree of trade relations between China and selected African countries along the Maritime Silk Route (MSR) and further appraise the trade potentials and gains inherent for African economies through the initiative. To achieve our objective, we apply quantitative techniques in trade evaluation to enable us explore and estimate the degree and intensity of trade engagements amongst selected Sino-African silk route countries, identify the trade opportunities and potentials, which are critical for increased trade engagements between both parties along the route and to explore some of the channels through which the maritime route can impact on investment, trade and economic growth in Africa. Findings from the analysis indicate that while the degree of trade integration is unbalanced and favourable to China relative to Africa, the trade pattern and structure are observed to be more complementary than competitive, and this provides Africa with ample opportunity to engage in product upgrading and diversification, critical for structural transformation.
Keywords: Maritime Silk Route; Belt and Road; Africa; Trade Complementarity; Trade Competitiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F15 F17 F18 O24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2017-12-19
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-cna and nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3119573 Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kiepwp:2017_007
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy [30147] 3rd Floor Building C Sejong National Research Complex 370 Sicheong-daero Sejong-si, Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Juwon Seo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).