The Battle Over Batteries: Chinese Ascendancy and Challenges for Korea

Eun Kyo Cho () and Woojung Shim ()
Additional contact information
Eun Kyo Cho: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Postal: Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea, http://www.kiet.re.kr
Woojung Shim: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Postal: Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea, http://www.kiet.re.kr

No 23/1, Research Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade

Abstract: In 2022 the US Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This law aims to reduce American dependency on Chinese batteries and reorder the global supply chain in America’s favor by excluding electric vehicles containing any minerals, materials, or parts sourced from China from federal new car subsidies. In response, China has launched a strategy to strengthen its secondary battery supply chain, leveraging its superiority in all aspects of the chain, including raw materials procurement and cell manufacturing. China’s strategy rests on three core pillars: 1) Internalizing or localizing advanced technologies, 2) globalizing China’s supply chain and increasing investment abroad, and 3) reinforcing the security of its supply chains of raw materials, particularly the supply chains for core minerals. For now, the intensifying US-China rivalry and growing divide in the global supply chain of secondary battery industries presents new opportunities for the Korean battery industry. However, China is determined to bolster its battery technologies and continue to invest abroad; this poses substantial challenges to the Korean battery industry. The Korean secondary battery industry now stands at a crossroads of risks and opportunities, brought about by the widening gaps in the global supply chain and China’s strategy to supercharge its battery industry. Korean policymakers must work to maintain Korea’s technologically superior position by investing in advanced battery research and by establishing a technological alliance with Japan, Germany, and the United States. Korea must also diversify its core minerals supply chains through using the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, and increase its shares in European, Southeast Asian, and other markets worldwide. It should also look to cooperate with China where possible in order to secure an edge over competitors in emerging markets.

Keywords: batteries; secondary batteries; energy storage solutions; US-China rivalry; technology hegemony; economic security; supply chains; technology localization; raw materials; industrial competition; technology competition; US; China; Korea (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F51 F52 F62 L60 L65 L72 L78 Q02 Q34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 2023-01-31
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-ene, nep-int and nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4469144 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kietrp:2023_001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aaron Crossen ().