Comparative Assessment of Supervisory Regulations Related to Appointment, Training and Change of Location

Gulsun Atanur Baskan

Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2013, vol. 5, issue 3, 185-191

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to compare and assess the Regulations of Elementary Education Directorates and Education Supervisors Directorates approved in 2011 from structure, process and rationale. In accordance with this purpose, the opinions of education supervisors (N=74) were determined by the questionnaire developed in accordance with the regulations by the researchers and consisted of 35 items. Data gathered was analyzed by mean. As a result, it was reached to the conclusion that supervisors do not agree with the changes related to application requirements to competitive exam. They agreed with the changes related to the items such as organization of written exam, appointment and location changes, extension of scope of duty of supervisors “partially†and they agreed with the changes related to subjects and point weights of competitive exam training and appointments of supervisors.

Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/393/393 (application/pdf)
https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/393 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:185-191

DOI: 10.22610/jebs.v5i3.393

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies from AMH International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Muhammad Tayyab ().