A Critical Note on Empirical Comprehensive Income Research
P. van Cauwenberge () and
I. de Beelde ()
Additional contact information
I. de Beelde: -
Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium from Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Abstract:
This paper presents a critical analysis of empirical comprehensive income research, the majority of which consists of value relevance studies. The first part of the analysis focuses on the functional form of the value relevance regressions. The paper distinguishes between the informational and the measurement approach to value relevance research and systematically traces the origin of the specifications under both approaches. The informational approach is characterized by diversity in functional form specifications, which can be traced to differences in expectations models for earnings or price/earnings ratios. In the light of this diversity, it is remarkable to observe that most of the authors provide little or no argumentation for the choice of their particular functional specification. While the authors under the measurement approach try to legitimize their regression specifications by referring to the work of Ohlson, in fact, one of the contributions of the residual income model is that it demonstrates the restrictive nature of these specifications. The second part of the paper performs a detailed investigation of the empirical findings. This analysis reveals several peculiarities that defy economic intuition. These peculiarities are nontrivial since they, together with the low explanatory power of the regressions, affect the credibility of the main research findings. The conclusion of the paper is that there is danger in taking the empirical findings of this research domain at face value and that the potential for informing standards setters is limited.
Keywords: Comprehensive Income; Dirty Surplus; Value Relevance; Residual Income Valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2007-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_07_463.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rug:rugwps:07/463
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium from Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nathalie Verhaeghe ().