The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes
Nava Subramaniam and
Neal M. Ashkanasy
Additional contact information
Nava Subramaniam: School of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Commerce and Management, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4214.
Neal M. Ashkanasy: School of Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072.
Australian Journal of Management, 2001, vol. 26, issue 1, 35-54
Abstract:
We examine the impact of managers' perceptions of their organisational culture (OC) on the relationship between budgetary participation (BP) and managerial job-related outcomes, operationalised as managerial performance and job-related tension (JRT). Does the relationship between BP and job-related outcomes would depend on managers' perceptions of innovation and attention to detail? Data supported predictions that increasing BP would lower JRT for managers perceiving a high emphasis on innovation within their OC, regardless of their perceptions of an emphasis on attention to detail. When managers perceived low innovation, however, their perception of level of attention to detail had a significant effect on the relationship between BP and JRT. More specifically, increasing BP was found to decrease JRT for managers who perceived low innovation and low attention to detail. For managers who perceived low innovation and high attention to detail, however, this effect was attenuated. Finally, the positive relationship between BP and managerial performance was not found to he affected significantly by managers' OC perceptions.
Keywords: BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION; ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE; CONTINGENCY MODEL; MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE; INTERACTIONS; INNOVATION (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289620102600103 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:26:y:2001:i:1:p:35-54
DOI: 10.1177/031289620102600103
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().