The legacy of war: The effect of militias on postwar repression
Sabine C Carey and
Belén González
Additional contact information
Sabine C Carey: University of Mannheim, Germany
Belén González: Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2021, vol. 38, issue 3, 247-269
Abstract:
How do wartime legacies affect repression after the conflict ends? Irregular forces support the government in many civil wars. We argue that if this link continues after the war, respect for human rights declines. As “tried and tested†agents they are less likely to shirk when given the order to repress. Governments might also keep the militias as a “fall-back option†, which results in more repression. Analyzing data from 1981 to 2014 shows that pro-government militias that were inherited from the previous conflict are consistently associated with worse repression, but newly created ones are not. Wartime pro-government militias target a broader spectrum of the population and are linked to worse state violence. New militias usually supplement wartime ones and use violence primarily against political opponents. This study highlights the detrimental impact of war legacies.
Keywords: Militias; physical integrity rights violations; post-conflict; repression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894219899006 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:247-269
DOI: 10.1177/0738894219899006
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().