Double standard: Chinese public opinion on the Hong Kong protests

Dimitar Gueorguiev and Dongshu Liu
Additional contact information
Dimitar Gueorguiev: 2029Syracuse University, USA
Dongshu Liu: 53025City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2024, vol. 41, issue 4, 343-364

Abstract: Research on social movements suggests that when protesters use violence, public opinion often turns against them, unless the observers already view the protesters as extremists. This creates what we refer to as an “asymmetric liability,†where by moderate protest movements are held to a higher standard of civility than more extreme ones. Based on a survey experiment surrounding the 2019 protests in Hong Kong, we show that violence undercuts Chinese public sympathy when movements are framed around rights-based agendas but has little impact when protesters are portrayed as separatists. Pairing our survey results alongside media trends offers suggestive evidence that mainland respondents became less sympathetic to anti-government protesters and slightly less sensitive to protest violence as state media began depicting protesters as radical separatists.

Keywords: Â China; contentious politics; Hong Kong; protest; public opinion; social movements; violence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942231174173 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:41:y:2024:i:4:p:343-364

DOI: 10.1177/07388942231174173

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().