Crisis bargaining in the European Union: Formal rules or market pressure?

Daniel Finke and Stefanie Bailer

European Union Politics, 2019, vol. 20, issue 1, 109-133

Abstract: To what extent did the European Monetary Union crisis alter the logic of European Union decision making? We analyze the relevance of asymmetric market pressures as compared to that of formal voting and agenda setting rules by applying three established bargaining models to the ‘EMU Positions’ data. Accounting for the interdependence between issues and agreements, we locate actors’ positions on three reform dimensions, namely the level of fiscal discipline, transfer payments and institutionalization. We find that market pressure during the height of the Eurozone crisis was particularly relevant, and that debtor countries were weakened by their difficulty in refinancing their public debt. Our finding shows that formal rules determining agenda setting and veto rights remain relevant even in times of crisis.

Keywords: Agenda setting power; bargaining models; Economic and Monetary Union; formal power; negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116518814949 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:109-133

DOI: 10.1177/1465116518814949

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().