Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal
Simon Niemeyer and
Clive Spash
Additional contact information
Simon Niemeyer: Social and Political Theory Group, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
Environment and Planning C, 2001, vol. 19, issue 4, 567-585
Abstract:
This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative – participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c9s (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:4:p:567-585
DOI: 10.1068/c9s
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications (sagediscovery@sagepub.com).