EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Medical Students’ and Tutors’ Experiences of Directed and Self-Directed Learning Programs in Evidence-Based Medicine

Peter Bradley, Christina Oterholt, Lena Nordheim and Arild Bjørndal
Additional contact information
Peter Bradley: Norwegian Medicines Agency
Christina Oterholt: University of Oslo
Lena Nordheim: Norwegian Centre for Health Services Research
Arild Bjørndal: Norwegian Centre for Health Services Research

Evaluation Review, 2005, vol. 29, issue 2, 149-177

Abstract: This qualitative study aims to interpret the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing two educational programs (directed learning and self-directed learning) in evidence-based medicine (EBM) for medical students at the University of Oslo from 2002 to 2003. There is currently very little comparative educational research in this field. In the trial, no statistically significant differences between the study groups were shown for any outcomes considered (EBM knowledge, skills, and attitudes). Further analysis suggests that main reason for the negative trial results was that the majority of students learned equally effectively, whichever program they received, although implementation of the educational programs was not complete because of varying attendance. This study illustrates a stepwise evaluation model that might be useful in evaluating other socially complex interventions.

Keywords: evidence-based practice; medical education; evaluation of complex interventions; directed learning; self-directed learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X04269085 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:29:y:2005:i:2:p:149-177

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X04269085

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:29:y:2005:i:2:p:149-177