EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Role of Need for Contraception in the Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Access to Family-Planning Methods

Federico R. León, Rebecka Lundgren, Irit Sinai and Victoria Jennings
Additional contact information
Federico R. León: León & Bustamante Consultores, Lima, Peru, frleon@amauta.rcp.net.pe
Rebecka Lundgren: Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University
Irit Sinai: Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University
Victoria Jennings: Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University

Evaluation Review, 2011, vol. 35, issue 1, 3-13

Abstract: A nonrandomized experiment carried out in Jharkhand, India, shows how the effects of interventions designed to improve access to family-planning methods can be erroneously regarded as trivial when contraceptive use is utilized as dependent variable, ignoring women’s need for contraception. Significant effects of the intervention were observed on met need (i.e., contraceptive use by women who need contraception) but not on contraceptive use (i.e., contraceptive use by women who may or may not need contraception). Met need captures the woman’s success in overcoming barriers to access to family planning, whereas contraceptive use confounds this construct with risk of pregnancy and fertility desires. Exceptions to this rule are identified.

Keywords: contraceptive use; met need for contraception; evaluation of interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X10396623 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:3-13

DOI: 10.1177/0193841X10396623

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Evaluation Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:3-13