Exploring ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Agency’ in Ronald Dworkin’s Theory of Rights: A Study of Women’s Abortion Rights in India

Nupur Ray
Additional contact information
Nupur Ray: Nupur Ray is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science, Kamala Nehru College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. E-mail: hope.nupur@gmail.com

Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2014, vol. 21, issue 2, 277-311

Abstract: Contemporary discourse in liberal theory is preoccupied with two concerns: first, the identification of secular and moral foundational principles that could guide political structures, independent of any conception of the good life or community goals ( Plant, 1991 ); and second, determination of the nature of political institutions ( Sen, 2001 , p. 148) that could give maximum freedom to individuals to pursue their life goals for reasons they value. These concerns emerged as a response to a persistent paradox in liberal theory. It is that in spite of its all ‘inclusive’ paradigm that incorporates each individual’s freedom to pursue goals irrespective of social identities it adheres to a formal notion of equality leading to exclusion at structural and institutional levels in social/political/and economic spheres, in invariably all societies. The exclusion has been manifested in three main areas: distribution of resources/opportunities/information in society, participation in crucial stages of the political process like decision-making, and gender issues. This exclusion has been more apparent in the case of historically oppressed groups (the largest being women) such as cultural/religious minorities, homosexuals, immigrants and backward classes. To understand and resolve this paradox, it is necessary to unfold the underlying foundations of liberal theory. In recent years, unlike non-liberal thinkers such as communitarians, socialists and cultural relativists who have rejected the discourse due to its paradoxical nature, different liberal political theorists have extensively engaged in resolving this paradox such as John Rawls, J. Waldron, Gewirth, Ackerman, the ‘best known’ among them being Ronald Dworkin.

Keywords: Rights; equality; empowerment; agency; women; capabilities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521514525158 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indgen:v:21:y:2014:i:2:p:277-311

DOI: 10.1177/0971521514525158

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Indian Journal of Gender Studies from Centre for Women's Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().