EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Perceptions of the Work Environment: The Issue of Gender in Indian Scientific Research Institutes

Namrata Gupta

Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2016, vol. 23, issue 3, 437-466

Abstract: Gender relations in organisations are a function of the socio-cultural and institutional context. This study analyses the perceptions of men and women scientists in India with respect to their work environment. It indicates that the twin aspects of Indian culture, patriarchy and hierarchy, contribute to a masculine environment at the workplace. Idealisation of women’s family roles as part of ‘Indian culture’ depresses women’s position as scientists. The hierarchical culture affects junior women scientists particularly through structural inefficiencies and gendered methods to subvert hierarchy. Since the Indian social milieu is in transition, changes are slowly taking place within organisations, offering hope for a change in gendered work environments. In exploring solutions to gender problems and understanding gender relations, the specific national context needs to be highlighted.

Keywords: Science; women scientists; hierarchy; family; women in the workplace (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521516656079 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:437-466

DOI: 10.1177/0971521516656079

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Indian Journal of Gender Studies from Centre for Women's Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:437-466