How Many Studies Do You Need?
Jeffrey C. Valentine,
Therese D. Pigott and
Hannah R. Rothstein
Additional contact information
Jeffrey C. Valentine: University of Louisville
Therese D. Pigott: Loyola University-Chicago
Hannah R. Rothstein: Baruch College
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2010, vol. 35, issue 2, 215-247
Abstract:
In this article, the authors outline methods for using fixed and random effects power analysis in the context of meta-analysis. Like statistical power analysis for primary studies, power analysis for meta-analysis can be done either prospectively or retrospectively and requires assumptions about parameters that are unknown. The authors provide some suggestions for thinking about these parameters, in particular for the random effects variance component. The authors also show how the typically uninformative retrospective power analysis can be made more informative. The authors then discuss the value of confidence intervals, show how they could be used in addition to or instead of retrospective power analysis, and also demonstrate that confidence intervals can convey information more effectively in some situations than power analyses alone. Finally, the authors take up the question “How many studies do you need to do a meta-analysis?†and show that, given the need for a conclusion, the answer is “two studies,†because all other synthesis techniques are less transparent and/or are less likely to be valid. For systematic reviewers who choose not to conduct a quantitative synthesis, the authors provide suggestions for both highlighting the current limitations in the research base and for displaying the characteristics and results of studies that were found to meet inclusion criteria.
Keywords: meta-analysis; research methodology; statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (46)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998609346961 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:215-247
DOI: 10.3102/1076998609346961
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().