Structural Transformation of Jobs from Manufacturing to Services: Will It Work for India?

Soumya Bhadury, Abhinav Narayanan and Bhanu Pratap
Additional contact information
Soumya Bhadury: Soumya Bhadury (corresponding author) is at the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, India.
Abhinav Narayanan: Abhinav Narayanan is at the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, India, e-mail: abhinavnarayanan@rbi.org.in
Bhanu Pratap: Bhanu Pratap is at the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, India, e-mail: bhanupratap@rbi.org.in

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2021, vol. 15, issue 1, 22-49

Abstract: India has struggled with the question of what to make in India—manufacturing or services. The Economic Survey 2014–2015 articulated that this was a false choice. Instead, India faced a choice between two disparate types of sectors, unskilled-intensive and skilled-intensive, in both of which India possessed a comparative advantage. Two years down the line, the Economic Survey 2016–2017 suggested that labour-intensive sectors may be more effective in addressing India’s job challenge. The World Economic Outlook Report 2018 has suggested that a rapid replacement in the share of manufacturing jobs by services is likely to have a welfare-enhancing effect on developed and developing economies alike. As the Economic Survey 2014–2015 suggested that this is both a positive and a policy question. This article re-examines this question of manufacturing versus services in the Indian context to contribute to this debate. Specifically, we use the KLEMS India dataset to examine the dynamics of labour productivity associated with (a) a steady shift in the composition of the workforce towards the services sector and (b) investment in human capital proxied by changes in the labour quality index. Contrary to the WEO’s policy prescription, our findings suggest that an increasing prevalence of informal job contracts in services could potentially weaken the positive relationship between labour quality and labour productivity. Additionally, we observe that India’s labour force seems to be rapidly shifting towards services sub-sectors with lower productivity. This mechanism is likely to obstruct any potential gains in productivity, associated with an optimal relocation of factors of production. JEL codes: J21, J24, O14, C31, C33

Keywords: Labour Productivity; Labour Quality; Employment; Structural Transformation; Panel Data; Quantile Regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973801020976608 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:22-49

DOI: 10.1177/0973801020976608

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().