Attitudes of Obstetricians and Gynecologists toward Hormone Replacement Therapy

Jonathan Baron, Gerald B. Holzman and Jay Schulkin

Medical Decision Making, 1998, vol. 18, issue 4, 406-411

Abstract: Objective. To determine the attitudes of obstetricians and gynecologists toward hor mone replacement therapy (HRT), and the beliefs and intuitions that affected those attitudes. Design. A questionnaire was sent to 1,000 gynecologists in the United States; 328 replies were received. The questionnaire asked about effects of HRT, practices concerning HRT, and decisions in hypothetical scenarios. Results. The re spondents strongly favored HRT, and they were well informed about its effects on osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and breast cancer. They were aware of conflict ing findings concerning breast cancer. The strength of their recommendation of HRT was sensitive to patient differences in risk factors. The respondents also showed four biases hypothesized to cause resistance to HRT: omission bias (more concern about harmful acts than harmful omissions); proportionality bias (attention to relative risk rather than risk differences); naturalness bias (preference for the natural); and ambi guity (avoiding options with missing information). Proportion bias, naturalness bias, and (weakly) omission bias were related to less favorable attitudes toward HRT. Con clusion. Although specialists are highly favorable toward HRT in general, some neg ativity toward HRT may result from decision biases. Key words: hormone replacement; estrogen; decision making; biases. (Med Decis Making 1998;18:406-411)

Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9801800408 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:4:p:406-411

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800408

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().