It May be Social, But Why is it Capital? The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language

Stephen Samuel Smith and Jessica Kulynych

Politics & Society, 2002, vol. 30, issue 1, 149-186

Abstract: Although the referents of the term social capital merit sustained inquiry, the term impedes understanding because of the historical association of the word capital with economic discourse. As a result of this association, applying the term social capital to civic engagement blurs crucial analytic distinctions. Moreover, there are important ideological consequences to considering things such as bowling leagues to be a form of capital and urging citizens to become social capitalists. The term social capacity, the authors argue, provides the same heuristic benefits as the term social capital without extending illusory promises of theoretical parsimony with the financial/human/social capital trinity .

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329202030001006 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:30:y:2002:i:1:p:149-186

DOI: 10.1177/0032329202030001006

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().