Colonialism and Industrialization: A Critique of Lewis

M. Shahid Alam
Additional contact information
M. Shahid Alam: Department of Economics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2004, vol. 36, issue 2, 217-240

Abstract: This article critiques W. Arthur Lewis’s economic explanation of the division of the world into industrial and agricultural countries. His claim that industrialization in the tropics was held back by small markets and adverse factoral terms of trade is flawed and lacks empirical support. His rejection of the imperialist origins of poverty is poorly argued, and his claim that colonial policies did not differ from policies of sovereign countries is not supported even by his own evidence. He also ignores the strong correlation between loss of sovereignty and poor growth performance.

Keywords: industrialization; colonialism; economic backwardness; Arthur Lewis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/36/2/217.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:36:y:2004:i:2:p:217-240

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().