Reactivity in Panel Studies and its Consequences for Testing Causal Hypotheses

Johannes van der Zouwen and Theo van Tilburg
Additional contact information
Johannes van der Zouwen: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Theo van Tilburg: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Sociological Methods & Research, 2001, vol. 30, issue 1, 35-56

Abstract: The procedure of standardized repeated measurement, as used in panel studies, may hamper the quality of the data, due to the potential “reactivity†of survey interviewing on respondents' attitudes and behavior. In case respondents are interviewed in subsequent waves by different interviewers, differential interviewer effects may occur. These threats to data quality are illustrated with data from a longitudinal study among 2,819 older adults, conducted in the Netherlands. From an analysis of 100 interview protocols, it appears that the behavior of the interviewers has a significant impact on the data obtained. On one hand, interviewers seem to adjust their interviewing strategy to a norm regarding a “normal†personal network and, on the other hand, to a norm about the appropriate interviewing time. Suggestions are formulated to prevent misestimating actual change within respondents over time, leading to incorrect conclusions about causal relationships.

Date: 2001
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124101030001003 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:30:y:2001:i:1:p:35-56

DOI: 10.1177/0049124101030001003

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().