Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary in the Philippines?

Rogelio Mercado

Working Papers from South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre

Abstract: This paper sets out to assess whether gross capital inflows to the Philippines are expansionary or contractionary in line with the model predictions and empirical findings of Blanchard et al. (2015). The results indicate that gross inflows are expansionary to output and credit growth. But contrary to the model predictions and empirical findings of Blanchard et al. (2015), we find that private bond inflows to the Philippines are expansionary. Bond inflows may have expansionary impact on output and credit growth if the exchange rate is managed, if the domestic capital market is underdeveloped, if the country receives small bond inflows, and if proceeds from debt issuance are channelled to productive investments. Similar to Blanchard et al. (2015), non-bond inflows have a positive overall impact on output and credit growth despite receiving relatively small foreign direct investment inflows.

Keywords: Capital Inflows; Output Growth; Credit Growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F32 F41 F43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2017-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.seacen.org/publications/RePEc/702002-100430-PDF.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are capital inflows expansionary or contractionary in the Philippines? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sea:wpaper:wp27

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Azharin ().